
Mainstream film companies usually have animated/moving logos. An example of this is MGM, which has featured Leo the lion in it's logo since 1924. Another example is Universal, which has had it's name orbiting earth since 1923 (when it was first pulled by a biplane!). The use of movement in these logos makes them more memorable to the audience and allows for the company to show off that they have bigger budgets with the use of CGI or in MGM's case, lions (6 to date).
Independent film companies, however, tend to go for more simplistic and static logos. This reflects their lower budget quality over quantity approach to film-making by giving more of an understated and minimalist look. As they do not have larger budgets things such as CGI is more difficult for them to fund, and so these logos are also more economical financially for the company; allowing them to spend what little budget they have on the film itself. I chose Film4 and Lionsgate as some examples of this; Film4 being especially simple, with a minimalist two-tone look which I'm a great fan of personally.
This will help me as it outlines the key ways in which Mainstream and Independent institutions make their logos differently; giving me a clear, simple view on how I can design an institutional logo for my own company which reflects the type of institution it is more suitably.



